Category: Uncategorized

Okay, so check this out—liquidity pools aren’t just backend plumbing anymore. They are the market. Really. For traders who used to chase order books, Automated Market Makers flipped the script and left a lot of old mental models behind. Whoa!

At first glance, liquidity pools look simple: you deposit two tokens, you get LP tokens, and you earn fees. Hmm… that’s the elevator pitch. But something felt off about treating them like a passive savings account. My instinct said: dig deeper. Initially I thought impermanent loss was the only risk, but then realized there are layers — fee structure, slippage behavior, pool composition, protocol incentives, and counterparty assumptions — that change the calculus.

Here’s the thing. Trading on DEXes is different in three core ways. First, price discovery happens on-chain via math, not matching. Second, execution cost is a function of pool depth versus trade size. Third, incentives (liquidity mining, bribes) distort supply curves. These are simple ideas, but they combine in complex ways that trip even veteran traders. I’m biased, but I think treating pools as living markets helps.

What actually moves prices in pools

Short answer: ratio changes. Longer answer: constant product curves, concentrated liquidity models, and adaptive fee mechanisms. On constant product AMMs like the old-school x*y=k, every swap shifts the ratio and thus the price. Medium-sized trades nudge the price; large trades push it hard, and slippage kicks in. Seriously?

Uniswap v3 added concentrated liquidity, which means depth is no longer uniform across prices. That changes how slippage scales with trade size, and gives LPs more control — and traders more to think about. On one hand you can get tighter spreads if liquidity is concentrated near current price; on the other hand, if price moves out of that range you face sharply reduced depth. On the other hand… though actually, that same concentrated depth can make routes brittle in a fast move.

My real-world vibe: when a volatile token has most liquidity on one side of the book, a modest sell order can cascade. I watched a memecoin dump where a 10% sale turned into a 30% realized move because liquidity was thin below the market. Yeah, that part bugs me.

How I size trades around pools

First, be explicit about max slippage. Small trade? Set 0.3% and move on. Bigger trade? Break it up. Seriously. Splitting orders reduces immediate slippage but increases exposure time. There’s a trade-off between execution cost and market risk.

Second, check pool depth in dollar terms, not just token liquidity. A pool with 1,000,000 tokens is meaningless if each token is a penny. Compute the effective depth within your acceptable slippage band. For concentrated pools calculate liquidity at price ticks that matter. Initially I underestimated tick math, but then I learned to eyeball the pool’s depth chart and estimate where pain starts.

Third, use route optimizers but don’t worship them. Aggregators help find multi-hop routes that minimize slippage. Yet sometimes the best route is a direct pool with a little more fee but far less tail-risk. Aggregators optimize immediate cost, not systemic risk. Actually, wait—let me rephrase that: they optimize for modeled cost, which may miss liquidity fragmentation across protocols.

LPing as a trading play

Providing liquidity can be a strategic complement to spot trading. You can earn fees which offset some price movement, and in volatile regimes, fee income can be surprisingly stabilizing. My gut says: don’t treat LP tokens like a bond. Treat them like an active position requiring monitoring.

Here’s a practical pattern I use: if I expect sideways volatility and I can concentrate near the current price, I LP for fee harvest and occasional rebalancing. If I expect a directional move, I either avoid concentrated positions or hedge with an offsetting short. Something like delta-hedging via perpetuals works, though it’s not free and carries its own margin risk.

Also, remember incentives. Many protocols offer extra yield that temporarily masks impermanent loss. Those are fine if you know the exit plan. Too often people jump into double-digit APRs and forget to check token emission curves. When rewards dry up, the underlying economics can look very different. I’m not 100% sure about long-term reward sustainability, but the pattern repeats across many chains.

Risk checklist before you trade

Do this fast. Check these five points each time: pool depth, fee tier, token liquidity on other venues, reward emissions, and smart contract risk. Small trade? Quick scan. Large trade? Run numbers. Really.

Smart contract audits help, but they aren’t a panacea. Rug pulls and admin keys still exist. Look for multisigs with time-locks and a public admin history. If the team can mint tokens or drain pools, price models become irrelevant. On some projects I avoid pools entirely because governance design is sketchy. Oh, and by the way, if you see a pool with tiny LP token supply and huge APRs—walk away. Very very likely it’s unsustainable or malicious.

Practical tools I use

DEX UIs for quick trades, that obvious. But for real sizing and risk I rely on on-chain explorers and depth visualizers. I also run simple spreadsheets that model impermanent loss across hypothetical moves. That helps me decide whether fees or rewards will likely cover loss over my holding period.

For routing and execution I mix aggregators with manual multi-hop routes. And when I want to be fancy I program a simple bot to split orders across blocks to reduce gas impact and exploit miner/pool timing. I’m not saying everyone should code bots; just know the option exists for larger traders. Hmm…

For those who want a strong, intuitive DEX experience, check out aster dex — their UI surfaces pool depth and fee tiers in a way that helps with quick sizing decisions. I used it to vet a few mid-cap trades, and it saved me from a mis-sized swap. I’m biased, but the clarity was helpful.

Tactics for volatile markets

In fast markets your priority shifts. Execution certainty matters more than chasing the last basis point. Use tighter slippage when you must preserve capital; accept a bit more cost to avoid being front-run or sandwich-attacked. Also, split and time orders across blocks if you can.

One trick: pre-seed a hedge. If I’m entering a sizable long on a thin token, I might open a short on a correlated derivative to cap downside during execution. That costs carry, but it reduces tail exposure. On the other hand, if you get the timing wrong you pay twice. It’s a balancing act — and an ugly one sometimes. I’m not proud of all my early trade attempts; the learning curve was steep.

Okay, last thought. Trading and LPing in DeFi isn’t an automated wealth machine. It’s an ecosystem of incentives, math, and human behavior. You’re dealing with code and economics at the same time. My advice? Learn the primitives, respect them, and adapt. You’ll make mistakes. Learn from them. Somethin’ about this space rewards the curious and punishes the complacent.

So go trade smart, watch your lanes, and check your assumptions often. I’m confident you’ll learn faster if you treat pools like markets, not vaults. Really.

Okay, so check this out—leverage trading on a decentralized exchange is simultaneously obvious and weird. Wow! For traders used to CEX perps, the mechanics look familiar at first glance: margin, funding, liquidation. But then things start to bend. My instinct said this would be a straight port, but actually, wait—let me rephrase that: perp trading on a DEX preserves the core math, though the on-chain realities change how you manage risk and execution.

Seriously? The first thing that trips people up is liquidity structure. On a CEX you see orderbooks or matching engines; on many DEXs perps are AMM- or hybrid-based, which means deeper analysis is necessary. Medium-sized slippage becomes a design variable, not just a worst-case fee. And on one hand the transparency is liberating—on-chain funding and positions are auditable—though actually, that auditing often reveals messy edge-cases like oracle lag and MEV squeezes.

Here’s the thing. Perp contracts still have funding rates that flip depending on market bias, and those payments can eat at returns. Hmm… but many DEX designs rebalance funding with liquidity incentives, which creates interesting arbitrage windows. Initially I thought funding was the same everywhere, but then realized that on-chain implementation details (how frequently funding is settled, who pays gas, how orders are matched) materially alter effective cost.

How the mechanics actually differ — practical takeaways

Short version: the algebra of leverage hasn’t changed. Long positions still gain when the underlying rises. Short positions still gain when it falls. However, the plumbing is different. Wow! Transaction latency is now public and monetizable, and liquidations happen on-chain where front-running and bidder competition can spike costs. On many DEXs, automated market makers provide the counterparty, which means your trade moves the pool and changes implied prices in non-linear ways.

So traders need to think in layers. Think about position size first. Then think about execution strategy. Then think about macro funding dynamics and oracle risk. My gut told me to treat leverage as a dial you spin and forget. But that instinct is dangerous here; being active about roll and funding is very very important. Also, small repeated mistakes compound—fees, funding, and slippage add up faster than you expect.

Liquidation mechanics deserve their own shout-out. On-chain liquidations can be messy because the cheapest-to-execute path is often a transaction auction that invites bots. On the flip, some DEX designs use capped slippage or insurance funds to soften the blow. I’m biased, but I prefer platforms that make liquidation parameters explicit and predictable (transparency beats opaque backstops in my book). Oh, and by the way, watch out for bad oracle feeds—if price inputs pause or lag, a position can be liquidated on a stale price.

Position sizing, risk rules, and how to think in “on-chain” terms

Start with a hard rule: cap leverage to what you can actively monitor. Short sentences are useful. Really. If you open 10x and ignore funding, you might lose more than you planned because funding can swing wildly during stress. On one hand, higher leverage magnifies gains; on the other hand, it makes your exposure to slippage, spread, and liquidation very very non-linear. Initially I used simple percent-of-portfolio rules, but then realized that per-trade gas and funding frequency need to be folded into sizing math.

Use tranching. Break a big desired exposure into staggered entries so you reduce slippage and average into position. Hmm… this requires discipline, and many traders hate doing it, yet it’s effective. Also, set alerts tied to oracle divergence thresholds—some platforms let you watch oracle spreads in real time. When you see divergence, consider hedging or reducing leverage immediately. That part bugs me: many traders treat on-chain oracles as just another price feed, when in fact they’re a security surface.

Margin calls and socialized losses are less opaque on-chain, but that doesn’t make them easier. Some DEX models socialize bad debt across LPs or use treasury backstops. Know the model. Know who bears loss in worst-case scenarios. And remember: protocol design choices change your counterparty risk profile—being decentralised is not the same as being risk-free.

Execution tactics — how to avoid paying the market

First, pre-check liquidity depth on-chain. Look at the pool invariants. Then plan trade slices. Wow! Use limit orders where available. Use conditional orders (post-only, reduce-only) to avoid being picked off. On-chain you can also use flashbots or private relays to reduce MEV extraction, though that introduces its own complexity (and cost). Actually, wait—let me rephrase: if you’re not comfortable with relays, then smaller trade slices and time-weighted execution are humble and effective.

Another practical tactic: hedge funding exposure by taking opposite positions across venues when funding becomes unfavorable. That’s arbitrage-y and not for amateurs, but it’s doable. My instinct said this requires large capital, but with leverage and small mismatches you can exploit differences with modest size—though the risks are higher and you need fast tooling to monitor it.

Check the UI/UX for failure modes. Does the DEX let you cancel pending orders quickly? Can you see pending funding accruals before you open a position? Those tiny UX details matter. They feel trivial until they cost you a margin call at 3 a.m. (yep, that happened; not proud of it). Somethin’ about platform ergonomics signals whether the builders thought about traders or just about TVL metrics.

Protocol and systemic risks — not just market risk

Don’t ignore smart contract risk. Bugs happen. A lot of protocols have audits, though audits are not guarantees. Hmm… insurance funds and multisig timelocks help, but they’re imperfect. On one hand, a large insurance fund can absorb shocks; on the other hand, it concentrates systemic trust in treasury governance. Decide if you want that trade-off. I’m not 100% sure where the balance lies, and you’re likely to form your own view after some on-chain bruises.

Oracles are another critical attack surface. Price feeds can be manipulated via low-liquidity assets, or by sandwiching on major markets to create temporary delta. Watch asset-specific liquidity across multiple venues; if an oracle relies on a thin pool, treat that funding as suspect. Also, know the protocol’s emergency controls and how governance could step in during stress. Sometimes governance halts are necessary. Other times they cause cascading losses due to delayed actions.

Okay, so check this out—if you want a practical place to start testing ideas, try small, track funding, and simulate liquidations on a testnet. When you graduate to mainnet, consider a DEX that balances deep liquidity with clear liquidation rules. One platform I’ve been watching is hyperliquid dex, which emphasizes predictable funding cycles and transparent pool mechanics—it’s not perfect, but it’s an example of design trying to put trader needs first. I’m biased by experience, but real-world interaction with these systems changes one’s perspective fast.

Ireland Miller and Janiah Moore

On Tuesday, Aug. 29, students gathered at the Science Mall, right at the heart of the campus, to network and grab some free food and giveaways. It was hard to not engage in that event since it was impossible to not pass it while walking to class.

“The goal of the Don’s College Picnic is to create, foster, and build pride for the university in general and colleges, like the College of Science, in particular,” said the Dean of the College of Science, Ronald Friedman.

The event served mainly as an information hub for those wanting to learn about the different colleges, degrees, and possible career opportunities found throughout campus.

There were 16 booths found at the picnic, such as the Career Development Center, Dormer School of Business, The College of Liberal Arts, the School of Education, and the Student Activities Board, among others, allowing students to connect and network with their fellow classmates and PFW staff. 

Students lined up early to check in for the anticipated event, with about 500 students attending within the first hour and a half of the picnic, according to Dean of the School of Education, Isabel Nuñez.

PFW has organized at least ten “Welcome Back to School” events between Aug. 22 and Aug. 31. The University also has hosted events for both high school students and future students, Nuñez said. 

PFW senior Brittany May heard about the picnic from the Student Activities Board (SAB) Instagram.

“I try to hit up all PFW events on campus for the fun and free giveaways,” said May.

There were free sandwiches from Firehouse Subs and Subway, and giveaways for items like notepads, pens, lunchboxes, and umbrellas. Students also could get a free T-Shirt from the College of Liberal Arts. 

“They had shirts, pins, and bottle holders that they were giving away,” said Emily Tyler, a PFW Psychology student. “I grabbed one of each.”

According to Tyler, everyone at the booths were so approachable and nice.

“It was very easy to walk right up and engage in a conversation while learning things about my college that I didn’t know, even going into my senior year of college.”

For Nursing student Paige Cavanaugh, the food was the favorite part of the event. 

“With this hot weather, the only thing that really keeps me focused is the next meal I’m going to eat,” Cavanaugh said. “It definitely helps balance the knowledge that is gained during these sorts of things.”

The Don’s College Picnic is a considerable way for students to meet staff and faculty helping at the booths. It also builds connections and associations with their colleges as well. 

“For example, a psychology or biology major cannot help but realize those departments are part of the College of Science when they visit our table,” Dean Friedman said. 

To stay informed on what happens around campus this semester, visit the Purdue University Fort Wayne website and check out the upcoming events calendar. 

Dezaray Clawson

On Aug. 31, over 90 student organizations set up shop on the Science Mall to recruit new participants and share their messages at the Purdue Fort Wayne Campus Connections Fair. Students looking to join clubs and find their place on campus lined up throughout the area to look around.

The Purdue Fort Wayne Connections Fair is an event held at the beginning of every semester as an opportunity for students to connect with local on and off campus organizations. This year, students could check in and receive a Purdue Fort Wayne tote bag to start before travelling to each table, many of which offered candy or other trinkets and toys.

One of the organizations holding a booth was the Photography Club, who are dedicated to the education and appreciation of photography.

“We are a group of creative people looking to find other creative people to appreciate the art of photography,” said club president Madison Foreman.

Like many other clubs found throughout campus, the Connections Fair is considered to be one of the best sources for sign-ups. The Photography Club ended the day with a total of 90 students registering to join.

“It’s great way to meet so many new people,” said Foreman. “We welcome people of all ability levels, so we’re an option for anyone attending.”

Not all groups attending were student organizations. Some other groups came out for a chance to make connections with the students. One group present was the Northeast Indiana chapter of the National Organization for Women.

“We’re here today to find potential new members but also to help young people register to vote,” said Chapter President Keiran O’Dowd.

NOW is “an intersectional, multi-issue, multi-strategy organization that takes a holistic approach to women’s rights”, and the organization can be found on Facebook. Students who stopped by their booth had the opportunity to sign up and join the chapter, register to vote, or check if their voting district had changed.

“A lot of people aren’t aware the lines are redrawn every 10 years,” O’Dowd said. “Just because you voted back in 2020, doesn’t mean you’re currently registered if your district changed.”

The Connections Fair doesn’t just benefit groups, it also allows new and returning students to find their new passion and meet others with similar interests.

One of the students in attendance was Sophia Cheng, a freshman engineering student who just moved to Fort Wayne from California. For Cheng, it was a chance for her to meet like-minded individuals and find some new friends.

“So far I only know a few people from my classes and my roommate,” she said. “I’m hoping to join a club and meet some new people.”

One of Cheng’s favorite booths to stop by was the Q Center, one of her reasonings was because they were offering various stickers as well as pronoun pins.

 As for clubs to join, she ended up finding a couple that worked for her.

“I joined the Asian American club and the Table Top RPG club,” Cheng said. “I loved seeing all the clubs in one place and hearing about what each one does.”

For those who were unsure if whether the Connections Fair would be worthy of their time, Cheng recommended coming in the future.

“It’s an amazing way to find clubs that you haven’t heard of yet.”

If you missed this semester’s Connections Fair, you can find a full list of student organizations on PFW’s website.

By Gavin Greer

Purdue Fort Wayne’s softball season begins today with a double header against Virginia Tech and UNC Wilmington.  

Last season, the Mastodons finished with a 7-42 total record. In conference play, they finished second to last with a 6-20 record. 

Amber Bowman leads the Mastodons in her second year as head coach. Heather Sanderson and Courtney Holm return as assistant coaches. Brian Tackett will join the team as a first-year volunteer assistant coach. Lauren Miller will also join the team as a first-year student manager. 

PFW looks to improve from last year’s poor season with the help of nine new incoming players.  

PFW has ten women returning this season, including junior infielder, Brooke Wintlend, who was awarded athlete of the week May 14 of last year. 

Most of the Mastodons opponents are the same as the 2022 season, but two big changes are that the team will have to matchup with Indiana on Mar. 3 and Wisconsin in a doubleheader on Mar. 4. 

PFW 2022 Stats 

Emily Coverstone

As the second semester of the school year begins, many students are beginning to get back into the groove of their academic lives and head back onto campus.

For some they will begin writing paper after paper, others will work on new sketches for their end of the year showcases. Yet, for a group of students found in Neff Hall they have to begin their hunt for patients to get their Dental Hygiene degrees.

From sophomore to senior year, students who are accepted into the Dental Hygiene Program get to learn as to what it exactly is that dental hygienists do in their day-to-day life while at work along with how to do it.

With clinics designed just like what you would typically see at an actual dental office, both friends, family members, and randomly assigned patients can get to see students learn more and more while cleaning their teeth and providing other services such as x-ray and scaling.

Each student in the program has to reach a certain number of patients each semester to move onto the next level and to also graduate. Although the students may have their agendas full at the beginning, not every patient can be reliable on showing up to their appointment, and because of this, that student can begin to fall behind on their requirements.

IUFW Junior, Alana Lester, has dealt with a patient or two canceling last minute, as well as many of her fellow peers who have also experienced the same thing.

“It is a slight setback when it comes to cancellations, as it is very difficult to get someone else to take that spot which in turn makes it difficult to meet requirements necessary to finish the class,” Lester said. “Many of us started this semester off behind due to the lack of patients from cancellations.”

The appointment itself will usually take around 4 hours to complete as students will be taking each step thoroughly and getting the go ahead by the licensed dentists and dental faculty who are supervising the students.

With hours differing each day of the week between the months of January to April, the clinic will be open Monday through Friday.

Monday	8:00 a.m. – noon 1:00 p.m. – 8:30 p.m.
Tuesday	1:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. 5:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m.
Wednesday	8:00 a.m. – noon 1:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.
Thursday	1:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. 5:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m.
Friday	8:00 a.m. – noon 1:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.

Not only does the clinic offer teeth cleanings, but for a reduced price, you can get oral exams and cancer screenings, periodontal assessments, local antibacterial medicaments, local anesthesia, oral hygiene instructions, fluoride treatments, sealants, and x-rays.

The Dental Clinic fees range from $20 to $64 depending on age and services. The clinic also accepts dental insurance to those who bring in their card and fill out the information on the paperwork handed out before the appointment.

An appointment is required and there are three reserved parking spots available in the patient-only parking lot (Lot 8) located outside of Neff Hall. Additional parking is available in Lot B and parking garages. Handicap spaces are available adjacent to Neff Hall.

To get a high-quality, low-cost preventative dental service with the IUFW Dental Clinic, call 260-257-6826. For more information about costs, services, or clinic hours go to https://www.iufw.edu/dental-clinic/index.html